"Tongkat-In Phra Nuer Wanj"

Composing starts on 25 March 2018.

 ***信不信由你*** 

"Tongkat-In Phra Nuer Wanj"

Sharing my PESRSONAL POINT OF VIEW ( personal okay ! ) regarding Tongkat-In Phra Nua Wanj. ( An amulet with an imprint of tip of the wand / maikru in the back @ widely known as Tongkat-In). This Tongkat-In Phra Nua Wanj believes to be a figurine of late Luang Phor Khron Ratchanren @ Tok Raja Khron @ Than Kong. Some of the Kelantan Phra-Kreung collectors believe that it was indeed CONSECRATED according to Bangsek’s secret by our late Than Kong. Some of irresponsible parties trying hard to convince these newcomers to believe that the depicted image on the amulet is the figurine of Luang Phor Khron Ratchanren @ Tok Raja Khron @ Than Kong  and this batch of amulet is RUNE SUTHAI ( last batch, that's why not many know about this batch ) and 100% made by Than Kong  

My personal point of view is simple. As for me, I strongly believe that the figurine casted / depicted is NOT Tok Raja Khron's. BUT it’s a figurine of Venerable Somdej Phra Rajamuni Samiramagunupamacarya or popularly known as Ven. Luang Pu Thuad Wat Chang Haiy, Pattanee. Why am I saying this ? My simple clarification towards this claim are ............. 

1. Physical Characteristics of Phra Nuer Wanj.

The basic physical characteristics are not parallel with the Bangsek's phim and style. If you observe carefully the base, the phra figurine is seated on the LOTUS THRONE. According to the Buddhisme custom and belief, ONLY those who has attaining ARAHANT @ BODDHISATVA level be able to be seated on the lotus throne. The argument is Than Kong would never permitted his image to be casted or printed on the lotus throne during his life time, because Than Kong would never consider himself as arahant or attained the arahant level.   

Some parties used to argue with me by saying that some of the sacred monks figurines were ALSO printed @ casted as seated on the lotus throne. So there's no issue here. For instances, Cha Pok Loh Wat Khao Kong, Luang Phor Lindam @ Orchik Wat Naka etc. My simple feedback to the argument is, those figurine ( Cha Pok Loh bucha statue and LP Lindam Taorit and Roubmeurn ) were made / produced AFTER THEY WERE DEMISED and NOT DURING THEIR LIFE TIME ! Those down-to-earth prominent monks will never claim and consider themselves arahant. Only laymen like us DID so !

I use to ask Phor Luang Kaew why the ordinary monks should not cast their image on the lotus throne. Pho Kaew replied it in short ......

" Uh Dok Pade Eh, Dok Chekak Not Tanggung La.....! "

( We are not up to the par and could not bear the SIN ! )  

2. The Neur / Composition of the Wanj @ Materials 

The composition of the neur wanj @ materials are not consistent and parallel with the neur from Bangsek. Meaning to say that the composition of the wanj @ materials are not consistent with the creation of late Than Kong a.k.a Phra Pidnar Phakhawan. Non of the Phra Pidnar Phakhawan made by late Than Kong bear the same composition of this Phra Neur Wanj Tongkat-In. 

3. The  'Tongkat' @ Wand Yant Imprint "Yakh"

 The akharak yant @ khom "Yakh" imprint in the reverse is neither the Yant Kru nor Than Kong favourite yant @ khom. As far as I concerned, none of Than Kong Maikru tip was crafted @ equipted with the YAKH yant imprint that can be used to produce the imprint like one we see in the reverse side of the feature amulet. As I said, none of the phra kreung and kreung lang made by Than Kong used the SINGLE akharak yant @ khom of "Yakh". Than Kong favourite SINGLE akharak yant @ khom  that can widely  be found is "Akh" and not "Yakh".

 4. Phor Luang Kaew's Point of View

Phor Luang Kaew @ Phor Kae said that this Phra Neur Wanj was secured from late Than Kong's room by late Chau Khun Chan after the demised of Than Kong. When asked  further about the origin of this Phra Neur Wanj, Phor Kae said that Chau Khun Chan went to the deep Samadhi and came to the conclusion that, it was considered as Than Kong's creation as it was blessed by late Than Kong himself but he couldn't assure bout the origin of this phra neur wanj because as far as his concerned, he ( Than Chan ) never seen or witnessed Than Kong  self made this phra neur wanj and there're no mold for such phim found. Phor Kae said that, Late Cau Khun Chan later re-blessed this phra neur wanj before distributing it to the devotees. Chau Khun Chan said that this phra neur wanj is superb for Khlew Khad and Nir-Antarai Plod Pai -- consistent with most of Luang Pu Thuad's amulets ! 

5.  Real story from Late Phor Than Dee of Wat Maisuwankiri,  and the tranced novice monk

The old true-experience story was retold by most of SENIOR KELANTANESE AMULET DIE HARDS. The story began when the novice monk from the temple was tranced by the unknown spirit. The novice monk was brought upon late Than Dee and after a short conversation with the spirit, Than Dee later announced that it was indeed Late Than Kong @ Khron Ratchanaren's spirit. All ( including late Than Dee, monks and other novice monks ) made a 3-prostration bow to Than Kong ( soul @ spirit ).

Late Than Dee then led the Qs & As with Than Kong's spirit. According to the eye witnesses, late Than Dee consulted Than Kong ( spirit ) about Bangsek Vicha and khatas, secret of making the phakhawan including the yant @ khata akhom inscribed to be inserted inside the phakhawan. and some unsolved Bangsek's mystery ). Before the spirit left the novice monk body, one of the novice monks came forward and handed his Phra Neur Wanj ( Tongkat In ) and Phakhawan to be blessed by Than Kong ( spirit ) and later it was identified as Phra Luang Pu Thuad and  not him ( Than Kong ) by the spirit !

After this rare incident and late Phor Than Dee started to collect some Phong and Wanj to make his 1st batch pidta phakhawan. It took him ( Than dee ) for several years before successfully gathered all the materials needed. We ( Kelantanese ) believe that, Than Dee's pidta was made according to the advice given by Than Kong 's spirit and was inserted with the akharak jant as directed by Than kong ( spirit ). Don't believe me blindly, go and ask ( Kelantanese ) around. Perhaps you will be narrated with the same story lines !!!!

6. Others Phra Kreung That Been Brought Back and Re-blessed by Late Than Kong

FYI, during Than Kong's era there were few phims of phra kreung & kreung lang that been distributed by him in Wat Uttamaram. The amulets were NOT by him but were GIVEN or BROUGHT back from other monks / temples after joining the phutapisek ceremony , as token of appreciation to be exact. For instances, 

1. Pidta Phakhawan Mahaud, Luang Pu Ee, Wat Sathahip.

2. Phra Somdej Phim Thewada, Luang Pu Nak, Wat Rakhang.

3. Phra Khun Paen 2497, Achan Chum Chaikiri.

4. Seur Jant Phra Pidta ** ( red magical vest ), Bangkok.
5. Phra KhongKhawan, Luang Phor Sod, Wat Paknam. **

6. etc

   ** to be discuss in-depth

 7. Than Kong SENIOR  Amulets Collector's Point of View

 To be honest........most of senior Bangsek's amulets collectors have shared the same  point of view, that is the depicted  figurine on this phra neur wanj is NOT Than Kong @ Khron Ratchanaren's BUT it’s a figurine of Venerable Somdej Phra Rajamuni Samiramagunupamacarya or popularly known as Ven. Luang Pu Thuad Wat Chang Haiy, Pattanee instead.

Most of them keep mum and refuse to utter a single word regarding this phim as...……. they kinda dun wanna HURT & SPOIL their friend / friendship who merely depend on amulets sales and profits for a living, they dun wanna mess-up with those so called Bangsek's expert and last but not least some of them were part of their business partner  - Dollar and Cents ! 

Something to ponder with......that's why the renting price for this "Tongkat-In Phra Nuer Wanj" will never sky-rocketed. The renting price is not soaring as other Than Kong's creations.  By spending few hundreds of RM, you are able to own it. Some of the irresponsible parties claimed that ………..

" The price is not expensive because it's not a popular phim by Than Kong and PLEASE REMEMBER THAT, NOT ALL THAN KONG'S STUFFS ARE POPULAR "

What a claim ! YOU HAVE JUST NAILED ME GUYS ! I personally would like to rubbish such claim, as for me the renting price is not sky rocketing merely because you guys know the casted image on the phra nuer wanj is neither Than Kong's figurine nor his creation !

Dear guys, bear in mind that the same hot issue that being discussed RECENTLY is regarding THIS phim phra kreung. The feature phra kreung ( below pics ) was claimed to be late Chau Khun Chan Roob Meurn Neur Wanj Chan Mark Tui which was made and consecrated by late Chau Khun Chan himself. As far as I ( WE - few of us to be exact ! ) concerned, this phim of phra kreung IS NOT Chau Khun Chan Roob Meurn. The claim was made as such PERHAPS because of the same reason ( Dollar and Cents may / could be other reasons ! ).  

'Haabooden' - So, whose roob meurn is this ??? FYI, it's a roob meurn of late Luang Phor ..………… B.E. 2506 of Wat…………, Songklha  province ! Stayed tuned for another post guys !!!! Hahahahahaha, forsure kena DIU la saya after this ! 

Back to the discussion above, I'M PRETTY POSITIVE that the depicted  figurine on this phra neur wanj is NOT Than Kong @ Khron Ratchanaren's BUT it’s a figurine of Somdej Phra Rajamuni Samiramagunupamacarya @ Luang Pu Thuad of Wat Chang Haiy, Pattanee.

p.s.: Still a good amulet indeed !!!

NO HARD FEELING ya !

Composing ends on 15 October 2018.

---

***信不信由你***

Merely Sharing @ Perkongsian Semata,

Wiesukhihotu Din Daeng

sabbe satta sukhita hontuk18 !

****************Muhasabah Diri *******************

JANGAN RIAK,
JANGAN TAKBUR,
JANGAN JADI HAMBA DUIT !
KALAU BETUL, KATAKAN BETUL.
KALAU SALAH, KATAKAN SALAH.
USAH BERMUKA-MUKA,
USAH MENJADI TALAM DUA MUKA,
USAH KERANA DUIT, PANGKAT, DAN KUASA,
KITA JADI HIPOKRIT,

MAKA..............
               YANG BETUL DIKATAKAN SALAH,
                              YANG SALAH DIKATAKAN BETUL !

********************Muhasabah Diri *****************